Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials

Qualitative focus groups with stakeholders identify new potential outcomes related to vaccination communication

General Information

Abstract:
INTRODUCTION: Communication interventions are widely used to promote childhood vaccination and sustain vaccine acceptance, but communication's role in changing people's beliefs and behaviours is not well understood. To determine why these interventions work or where they fail, evaluations must measure a range of outcomes in addition to vaccination uptake. As part of a larger project to develop a preliminary Core Outcome Set for vaccination communication, we conducted a qualitative focus group study exploring how parents and health professionals perceive and experience communication encounters and what outcomes are relevant to them. METHODS: Focus group participants included parents and health professionals involved in vaccination communication (healthcare providers, researchers and policymakers). Participants discussed their experiences with communication for childhood vaccination, and what made the communication 'successful' or 'unsuccessful.' Our analysis involved two stages: first, we thematically analysed the discussions, identifying key parent and professional themes. In stage two, we used an interpretive analysis approach to translate the themes and quotes into measurable outcomes. We compared these outcomes with outcomes measured in vaccination communication trials (previously identified and mapped). RESULTS: We held three focus groups with parents (n = 12) and four with professionals (n = 19). In stage one, we identified six parent themes (primarily related to decision-making) and five professional themes (primarily related to intervention planning, delivery and evaluation). In stage two, we translated 47 outcomes from parents and 73 from professionals (91 total, de-duplicated). All stakeholders discussed attitudes or beliefs and decision-making outcomes most frequently. Most (66%) of the focus group-generated outcomes were not measured in vaccination communication trials. CONCLUSION: Consulting with stakeholders through focus groups allowed us to explore how parents and professionals experienced vaccination communication, identify those aspects of the experience that were important to them, and translate these into outcomes that can be prioritised into a Core Outcome Set and measured in intervention evaluations.

Authors:
Kaufman, J. Ryan, R. Hill, S.

Publication

Journal:
PLoS One
Volume:
13
Issue:
8
Pages:
e0201145 -
Year:
2018
DOI:
Further Study Information

Date:
July 2015 - May 2016
Funding source(s):
JK and SH were supported by the Global Health and Vaccination Research (GLOBVAC) program of the Research Council of Norway (COMMVAC 2 project grant number 220873). SH and RR received funding from a Cochrane Infrastructure Grant provided by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC).

Health Area

Disease Category
Child health
Public health

Disease Name
N/A

Target Population

Age Range
-

Sex
Either


Nature / type of Intervention
Vaccines

Method(s)

Focus group(s)

Stakeholders Involved

Clinical experts
Consumers (caregivers)
Policy makers
Researchers

Study Type

COS for clinical trials or clinical research
Patient perspectives

The site uses cookies, some may have been set already. Please refer to our privacy policy & cookie usage statement.
If you continue to use the site we'll assume you're happy to accept the cookies.