Accurate assessment of important outcomes provides essential evidence for judging the value and effectiveness of care. However, in proximal humerus fractures, there is limited outcome reporting guidance. Heterogeneity in reporting and limited consideration of important patient outcomes undermines data synthesis and impedes the developing evidence base. The aim of this project is to develop a core outcome set for proximal humerus fractures.
The study will be supported by an interdisciplinary research team, wider international advisory group and a patient research partner group. Systematic reviews of outcome reporting coupled with reviews of qualitative literature, combined with semi-structured interviews with patients will support the identification formulation of a list of potential outcome domains. The domains will then be prioritised through an international e-Delphi process with multiple stakeholders.
Kirstie Haywood (Principal investigator)
- COS for clinical trials or clinical research
- COS for practice
- Delphi process
- Focus group(s)
- Nominal group technique (NGT)
- Systematic review